How does the project move forward?
From scope confirmation to site handover.
View the 4 stages →If your team needs to know what documents exist, when they get issued, and who confirms what before the panels leave the factory — this page covers that.
Delivery System should explain how the project is controlled from scope confirmation to handover. It should not try to answer project similarity, issue diagnosis, or project-specific intake on its own.
This page should answer whether the process is controlled, whether the document flow is clear, and whether the team knows what must be confirmed before the project moves too far.
From scope confirmation to site handover.
View the 4 stages →For review, QC, packing, and handover.
View document packs →Before fabrication, delivery, and handover.
View key questions →Use these stages to understand how the project moves forward, when documents are issued, and where confirmation is needed. This page should explain control, not replace Resources or Submit Requirements.
Check the main scope, interfaces, assumptions, and deliverable boundaries early so the project starts from a clear basis.
Provide drawings and key documents for review and approval in a controlled format rather than through scattered files and unstable assumptions.
Close revisions and confirm key details before production starts so the project does not move forward on unclear or shifting inputs.
Support packing, site receiving, traceability, and handover documents so delivery does not create avoidable site confusion later.
These packs should support control and routing. They should not turn this page into a resource library. Use them to understand what document structure exists, then move into Resources or Submit Requirements when the issue becomes specific.
When to use this pack: when drawing structure, review routing, revision closure, or submittal control needs to be understood.
When to use this pack: when scope split, assumptions, or trade-interface responsibilities need to be reviewed before the project moves forward.
When to use this pack: when approval, sign-off, acceptance, or handover depends on clearer quality and traceability records.
When to use this pack: when packing, shipment, site receiving, or handling needs to be reviewed before delivery reaches site.
When to use this: when the site team needs a structured receiving workflow before panels arrive — covering crate inspection, panel ID checks, damage reporting, and photo records.
Delivery System should explain control. It should not try to answer project similarity, issue diagnosis, or project-specific intake on its own.
Scope, interfaces, assumptions, and revision closure should be clear before release.
Typical documents include review checklists, revision records, QC fields, packing information, and handover lists.
By confirming key details early, closing revisions before release, and keeping responsibilities clear across teams.