PG Acrylic
DELIVERY SYSTEM

How we define scope, issue documents, and control what gets confirmed before fabrication.

If your team needs to know what documents exist, when they get issued, and who confirms what before the panels leave the factory — this page covers that.

Deliverables defined early Scope clarified before fabrication Delivery risk controlled before site impact

What this page should do

Delivery System should explain how the project is controlled from scope confirmation to handover. It should not try to answer project similarity, issue diagnosis, or project-specific intake on its own.

WHAT THIS PAGE HELPS YOU UNDERSTAND

Three control questions before site impact.

This page should answer whether the process is controlled, whether the document flow is clear, and whether the team knows what must be confirmed before the project moves too far.

PROJECT STAGES

Four simple stages from scope to handover.

Use these stages to understand how the project moves forward, when documents are issued, and where confirmation is needed. This page should explain control, not replace Resources or Submit Requirements.

Stage 1

Confirm scope

Check the main scope, interfaces, assumptions, and deliverable boundaries early so the project starts from a clear basis.

Stage 2

Prepare review documents

Provide drawings and key documents for review and approval in a controlled format rather than through scattered files and unstable assumptions.

Stage 3

Release for fabrication

Close revisions and confirm key details before production starts so the project does not move forward on unclear or shifting inputs.

Stage 4

Deliver and hand over

Support packing, site receiving, traceability, and handover documents so delivery does not create avoidable site confusion later.

LINKED DOCUMENT PACKS

Use these packs when your team needs structure for review, scope checks, QC, packing, or handover.

These packs should support control and routing. They should not turn this page into a resource library. Use them to understand what document structure exists, then move into Resources or Submit Requirements when the issue becomes specific.

Submittal Pack

When to use this pack: when drawing structure, review routing, revision closure, or submittal control needs to be understood.

  • Drawing set index
  • Review checklist
  • Revision log
  • Transmittal notes

Scope & Interface Pack

When to use this pack: when scope split, assumptions, or trade-interface responsibilities need to be reviewed before the project moves forward.

  • Scope matrix
  • Interface notes
  • Assumptions list
  • Change handling notes

QC & Traceability Pack

When to use this pack: when approval, sign-off, acceptance, or handover depends on clearer quality and traceability records.

  • QC record fields
  • Traceability summary
  • Nonconformance notes
  • Panel ID mapping guidance

Packaging & Handling Pack

When to use this pack: when packing, shipment, site receiving, or handling needs to be reviewed before delivery reaches site.

  • Packing specification
  • Receiving checklist
  • Handling guidance
  • Storage requirements

Receiving Checklist — Sample

When to use this: when the site team needs a structured receiving workflow before panels arrive — covering crate inspection, panel ID checks, damage reporting, and photo records.

  • 6-step site receiving sequence
  • Crate and label inspection
  • Surface and edge check procedure
  • Damage reporting with SR-ID reference
NEXT PAGE LOGIC

What to do after understanding the delivery system

Delivery System should explain control. It should not try to answer project similarity, issue diagnosis, or project-specific intake on its own.

Choose the next page based on what is still unclear.

Installed Projects & Updates — if project similarity is still unclear Resources — if the issue is already clear but the right materials still need review Submit Requirements — if the issue already affects a real project decision
KEY QUESTIONS

Three practical questions before release, delivery, and handover.

What needs to be confirmed before fabrication starts?

Scope, interfaces, assumptions, and revision closure should be clear before release.

What documents will support review and handover?

Typical documents include review checklists, revision records, QC fields, packing information, and handover lists.

How do we reduce rework and unclear scope later?

By confirming key details early, closing revisions before release, and keeping responsibilities clear across teams.