01
EPC / Main Contractor
Use this path when your team is responsible for scope alignment, trade coordination, project interfaces, and keeping fabrication or delivery decisions from moving forward on unstable assumptions.
Top risk
Scope gaps, interface ambiguity, and avoidable coordination loops before fabrication or delivery.
Start here when the main question is whether similar project conditions have already been handled and whether scope boundaries and interfaces are already clear enough to move forward.
- Check project similarity first when comparable conditions are still uncertain
- Move to Resources when the issue is already clear but scope materials still need review
- If the project involves a tunnel, review the Underwater Tunnel application note — geometry, joints, and civil coordination must be resolved before fabrication
- For the panel-to-concrete interface on large pool walls, review interface coordination & recess drawing — most structural and waterproofing risk sits at the civil interface, not the panel
- Move into Submit Requirements only when scope uncertainty already affects a real project decision
02
Design Consultant
Use this path when your team needs cleaner review logic, controlled assumptions, clearer drawing structure, or fewer repeated technical comment cycles.
Top risk
Unclear review basis, weak revision traceability, and repeated comment cycles.
Start here when the main question is whether the review package is structured clearly enough for technical comments, approvals, and controlled follow-up.
- Review drawing index, checklist, revision visibility, and assumptions first
- Use Resources when the review issue is already clear but the package still needs structure
- If thickness, span, or interface assumptions are still open, use the Thick PMMA Panel Thickness note — it covers the five inputs that govern panel thickness across all application types
- Move into Submit Requirements only when the issue already blocks approval or technical closure
03
Owner Procurement
Use this path when your team is focused on documentation completeness, QC traceability, acceptance records, audit readiness, or handover clarity.
Top risk
Documentation gaps, weak QC traceability, and unclear handover readiness.
Start here when the main question is whether the quality and handover record set is structured clearly enough for review, sign-off, and archive expectations.
- Review QC fields, traceability logic, panel mapping, and handover structure first
- Use Resources when the documentation issue is clear but the evidence set still needs review
- For large-scale or public installations, review the Oceanarium Panel note — it covers the review evidence package, material certifications, and third-party review scope that owner specifications typically require
- Move into Submit Requirements only when missing records already affect approval, acceptance, or handover decisions
04
Installer / Site Team
Use this path when your team is focused on delivery readiness, receiving checks, handling logic, storage conditions, panel identification, or installation-stage coordination.
Top risk
Receiving errors, handling damage, and installation-stage coordination gaps.
Start here when the main question is whether delivery, handling, and receiving information is already clear enough before panels reach site.
- Review packaging specification, handling guidance, receiving checklist, and panel identification first
- Use Resources when the delivery issue is already clear but the material set still needs review
- If installation involves a tunnel, review the Underwater Tunnel note — installation sequence is a structural constraint, not a logistics choice
- Move into Submit Requirements only when site coordination, receipt, or handling concerns already affect a real project decision
05
Pool Contractor
Use this path when you are building or quoting a pool that requires an acrylic viewing panel, transparent pool wall, or overflow panel — and need to confirm thickness, interface, and installation conditions before fabrication.
Top risk
Specifying thickness from water depth alone — without confirming span, support condition, and interface detail first.
Start here when the project has a pool opening that needs an acrylic panel and the thickness or interface hasn't been confirmed yet.
- Check the Pool Viewing Wall note first — it covers span, support condition, and what needs to be confirmed before thickness can be finalised
- If water depth is the only input you have so far, that's the starting point — the note explains what else is needed
- Review comparable installed conditions in Installed Projects if you're unsure whether your opening type has been handled before
- Move into Submit Requirements when you have dimensions, water depth, or opening drawings ready to share
06
Coral / Themed Environment Specialist
Use this path when your project involves artificial coral, reef structures, or marine theming elements coordinated with acrylic viewing panel positions — aquarium, oceanarium, water park, or themed attraction.
Top risk
Theming scope confirmed after panel fabrication — leading to clearance conflicts, scenic-element interference with viewing lines, and rework at the panel-to-theming boundary.
Start here when the main question is how artificial coral, reef structures, or scenic theming will be supplied and coordinated with the acrylic viewing panel installation schedule.
- Review the Artificial Coral & Reef Supply note — covers custom coral, reef structures, marine theming, colour-stable / fish-safe fabrication, and how scope is confirmed against tank layout and panel positions before fabrication
- If the project also includes large viewing panels, review the Aquarium Viewing Panel note — theming clearance must be coordinated with the panel interface
- Check Installed Projects for themed-environment installation stages and completed themed aquatic environment references
- Move into Submit Requirements when tank layout, panel positions, or theming scope can be shared as project-specific inputs